Recent statements fromAmihay Eliyahu, the Israeli Minister of Heritage, on the subject of a possible nuclear capability of Israel caused great international excitement. Eliyahu’s enigmatic response to a radio question about the use of nuclear weapons in Gaza.” It’s a possibility“, triggered a series of virulent reactions, in particular from the Russia. Maria ZakharovaRussian Foreign Ministry spokesman, quoted by the state news agency LAUGHexpressed deep dismay at what appears to be an official admission by Israel of the possession of nuclear weapons, although this has never been publicly acknowledged by theHebrew state.
The controversy intensified when Zakharova asked the crucial question: ” Are we facing official statements about the presence of nuclear weapons? » This question highlights Israel’s ambiguous position on its arsenal, roughly estimated 90 nuclear warheads over there Federation of American Scientists. The issue of international verification byInternational Atomic Energy Agency and other inspectors are raised sharply, raising concerns about the strategic balance in an already tense region.
The impact of these revelations on Israeli domestic politics was immediate, with Minister Eliyahu suspended from cabinet meetings by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. until further notice“. This measure, although significant, does not respond to the concerns raised internationally about the transparency and regulation of Israel’s nuclear capabilities.
In the midst of this diplomatic storm, the United States, through its Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, tried to ease the tensions. Faced with the bombings that have caused numerous Palestinian civilian casualties, Blinken urged Israel to adopt a ” humanitarian pause » in Gaza. Despite his talks with Netanyahu a Tel Avivand the emphasis placed on the importance of this truce to facilitate humanitarian aid, the Israeli response was not long in coming.
Netanyahu rejected Blinken’s call, saying on television that his country would not consider a temporary ceasefire without the release of its hostages. He reiterated Israel’s resolve to fight Hamas.” with all our strength », highlighting an inflexible stance in the current context.
Iran’s reaction to this affair was also not long in coming. The Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Hossein Amirabdollahianstated on Platform X: ” The UN Security Council and the International Atomic Energy Agency must take immediate and uninterrupted action to disarm this barbaric and apartheid regime. Tomorrow, it will be too late. » These words reflect the urgency and seriousness perceived by certain international actors in the face of the situation.
The international community is at a critical crossroads, torn between the need to maintain regional peace and the need to deal with potentially strategic and game-changing revelations. The coming days will be pivotal in the quest for tenuous stability in the Middle East, as the implications of Israel’s alleged confessions and calls for humanitarian action in Gaza continue to reverberate on the world stage.
